Some of you may recall that in early October we talked about the Statute of Frauds, and Lessig said he would provide "a very clear and simple summary" if we posted more on the web page. Well, we must have failed the test, cos no summary appeared. I asked him if we could still get the summary, and suggested that there was demand within the class for it. He replied:

"let's see the demand."

So if anyone who is interested could post a reply, maybe we can get Lessig to summarize for us...

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

Answers

I am all for summaries....

Tawen

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

I'm for summaries

Summarize me, baby!

Wait, that didn't come out right...

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

summaries

hit me with them, i am ready.

[oh, and a chart of damage interests and this and that too, if it's not too much trouble]

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

I would really appreciate a summary. Thanks!

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

Summary would be great. What about the answers to the UCC questions posted?

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

Summary and Option K

It seems to me that Prof. Lessig essentially offered us an option contract when he promised to post a summary if we would increase our posts to the newsgroup. I would further submit that we accepted this offer by substantially performing (all one has to do is look at the frequency of posts to this board relative to those maintained by our other professors).

Can we now compel performance? Would that upset important norms surrounding the professor-student relationship? Will I be beaten severely for making so many bad legal jokes?

cheers,

a

PS: It seems that the same sort of argument could be made regarding Prof. Lessig's promise to give us juicy gossip regarding Prof. Hay.

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

A summary would be great! merry

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

"Please sir, may we have some-more"-y.

Beat Andrea first! He set the bad example...

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

OOPS. I meant ANDY. (my apologies to aa)

But I do vote for a summary.

-- Anonymous, December 13, 1998

A summary would be VERY helpful. Thanks!

-- Anonymous, December 14, 1998

A summary would be really helpful - thanks! (I also second Rebecca's interest in answers to the UCC questions posted, if it's not too much trouble)

- Emmeline

-- Anonymous, December 14, 1998

yeah, i guess a summary would be okay. But what i really want for christmas is a puppy!!

-- Anonymous, December 14, 1998

show me the summaries

yup. a statute of frauds summary sure would be nice.

-- Anonymous, December 14, 1998

like to especially have answers to UCC questions....but a SOF would be helpful as well

-- Anonymous, December 14, 1998

Yet another vote for summaries and UCC answers.

-- Anonymous, December 15, 1998

Lukey like summaries.

-- Anonymous, December 15, 1998

Please give us summaries.

-- Anonymous, December 15, 1998

A summary of SOF would be great!

thanks -

jason

-- Anonymous, December 15, 1998

Another vote for summaries

I'm all for summaries.

-- Anonymous, December 15, 1998

I would love summaries, too. Thanks.

-- Anonymous, December 15, 1998

I'd love to have a SOF summary, too.

-- Anonymous, December 16, 1998

I for one feel so confident with the statute of frauds that I don't think a summary is necessary.

Actually, I lie. Just wanted to stand out from the crowd. In truth I readily join the cacophony of voices asking for any / all summary and impartment of wisdom that might be provided.

thanks, nathan

-- Anonymous, December 17, 1998

I would truly like the Lessig's reponse to the U.C.C. questions but I think that a SOF summary would also be most helpful. Thanks Maggie

-- Anonymous, December 17, 1998