Folks

I am going to try something new to me.

While poking aroung the GPO looking at GAO documents I noticed that the "21 cities" document wasn't on the list of GAO Y2K documents. This was in the press earlier in July and was a topic of the Y2K Senate hearings but the Document itself didn't get noticed to much. I wanted to add it to a collection of GAO documents posted earlier.

So checking up on the situation it would seem that it was scanned in (sneaky buggers). This is why it never got much attention because you can't reformat scanned images.

After the big brew hah over the Naval Report from Jim Lord it amazes me that no connection, even remote connected the findings of the two documents. And because most folk on the internet are graphicly challanged, most didn't know of the contents and or couldn't relay the contents.

So I have taken a few gifs of the contents and posted them on my web site. Just thought that interested parties would like to know that the Naval report has a basis of truth to it.

Some may even remember in July my comments on the GAO report below. 
 

 Cities

http://www.gao.gov/corresp/AI99246R.PDF
 

Snip

 
 
 
 

-- Anonymous, September 05, 1999