Source: Purdue University (http://www.purdue.edu) Date: Posted 7/7/2000

Plant Oils Will Replace Petroleum In Coming Years

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind.  When Bernie Tao talks to farmers, he tells them that although they may not realize it, they're oil barons. The oil they control isn't below the ground, however. It's growing on top, contained in the corn and soybean plants in their fields.

It may be green gold instead of black gold, but Tao predicts that over the next several decades, plant oil will become just as essential to everyday life as fossil fuels are today.

"In the 1970s we got our first taste of what it was like when the fuel begins to go away," Tao says. "Three decades later we're beginning to see the start of another large petroleum crunch. And part of that is consumer demand, which has greatly increased. Consumers like this stuff!"

Anyone standing at a gasoline pump this summer watching the digits scroll by may wonder whether prices are going to go down. Over the long-term, Tao points out, they won't.

"One-time-use resources, which are also known as non-renewable resources, such as petroleum, are a problem because you eventually run out," he says. "Eventually we will have to switch from using non-renewable resources to using renewable resources."

But Tao and others say that the potential is already there for common field crops, such as corn and soybeans, to replace petroleum oil as the driver of our economy within a few decades.

"With a biobased economy, you can produce new raw materials every year, so you don't have this type of problem," he says.

Although most biofuel discussions center on ethanol, that's not the only option, Tao says. "The obvious substitutes for petroleum are plant oils and fats because they have the same base chemical structure as petroleum," he says.

Ethanol is a type of alcohol made by fermenting plant material. Although it makes a good fuel, it has drawbacks, Tao says. "The economics of ethanol production are improving as the technology improves," he says. "But ethanol has two problems: It doesn't explode like gasoline, and it can absorb water, which can cause oxidation, rust and corrosion."

By manipulating plant oils, Tao says it may be possible to create a petroleum substitute.

Fossil fuels were plants once, millions of years ago, and so it makes sense that both the fossil fuels we use today and oils produced by plants are chemically similar. Both are made up of chains of chemicals known as hydrocarbons.

A hydrocarbon is a carbon atom surrounded by hydrogen atoms. Methane, the simplest hydrocarbon, is a single carbon atom surrounded by four hydrogen atoms. Gasoline varies from seven to 10 hydrocarbons long. "In fact, the word 'octane' means eight carbons in a chain," Tao says.

The shorter the chain of carbons, the more explosive the fuel is, and the more power it offers an engine.

The problem is that plant oils are 14 to 18 carbons in length. "Diesel fuel is 15 carbons long, which is close to the same size as plant oils. That is why the first applications are as biodiesel fuel," Tao says. "You couldn't burn vegetable oils in today's gasoline engines because their hydrocarbon chains are too long."

Tao says the possibility exists to make a type of plant gasoline from plant oils that have shorter carbon chains.

"Not surprisingly, shorter-chain vegetable oils do exist," he says. "Coconut oil, tropical oils and similar plant oils might make a reasonable gasoline-like fuel. It might also be possible to transgenetically modify crops to produce plants with those lengths of fatty acids."

Tao says future scientists could genetically modify corn and soybeans  which are already two of the highest oil-yielding plants  to produce plant oils that could be converted into a type of gasoline. "Could you produce a fuel by combining vegetable oil and ethanol? Actually, the combination of those would seem to fit nicely into today's engine structures," he says.

Fuels aren't the only uses of petroleum, Tao says. "If you look at where petroleum is used, the largest number of applications is in inks, paints and coatings."

Chemists have known for decades how to alter the hydrocarbon chains in petroleum through processes known as cracking and reforming. Shortened hydrocarbon chains are used as solvent bases for paints and chemicals. Longer chains  as many as 200 hydrocarbons  are known as plastics. But these products also can be made from plants.

According to Tao, before World War II, most paints, coatings and adhesives were made from vegetable oils or other plant products. "In the very near future, some of these products will go back to using vegetable oils instead of petroleum," Tao says. "There are latex paints that will be appearing on the market very soon."

This isn't a new idea: Henry Ford famously made everything from clothing to automobile bumpers from vegetable oils just to show that it could be done. And this past January, Dow Chemical Co. and Cargill Inc. announced that they will begin production of new plastics made from corn.

Despite this, most products are still made from petroleum instead of plants. Tao says a look around will show thousands of products that were once made from plants that are now made from petroleum products. "Candles, for one," he says, holding up a blueberry-scented candle made from soybean oil. "It's only been in the last 60 to 70 years that paraffin wax candles were common."

As part of an annual contest sponsored by the Indiana Soybean Board, students at Purdue have created a variety of products that replace petroleum products with soybean oil, such as candles, crayons, ski wax and fire starters.

"There isn't a huge demand for scientists to develop soybean oil birthday candles or crayons," he admits. "But these products are safe for the students to work with. And once they know how to work with the plant oils, they'll be better positioned to help create other new products over the next 40 years.

"As we change from a black gold economy to a green gold economy, we'll need engineers who know how to make products out of plant materials. That's why we work with these students to make these types of products now."

The need for petroleum is never going to go away, but the question is, how are we going to use it, Tao says. "Plastics are made from petroleum chains 200 carbons long," he says, tapping the case of his computer monitor. "We'll be saving petroleum to make things that we can't make in any other way."

Editor's Note: The original news release can be found at http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/0007.Tao.biofuels.html

-- cin (cin@cin.cin), July 09, 2000

Answers

I have no expertise here but it seems unlikely that millions of barrels of portable, concentrated energy will ever be produced from biomass. Not to mention the econmics of it. How many acres of corn or soybeans are required to produce the same portable BTUs as a tanker of petroleum?

Don't forget that Purdue and agri-business are just as profit-driven as Shell Oil.

-- Lars (lars@indy.net), July 09, 2000.

The energy required to obtain plant oils is prohibitive in the work I've seen.... alot of work is going to have to happen to make this economic.... oh I forgot ,,,it's genetic engineering to the rescue.

-- Will (righthere@home.now), July 09, 2000.

It shouldn't be news that vegetable oils can be used to create many of the same products as petroleum. Petroleum comes from ancient biomass. The bigg difference, as far as I can see, is that the ancient biomass that formed petroleum has already been subjected to a lot of transformative energy over time. For free.

By the time we get ahold of petroleum, less energy input is needed to complete the job of refining it into useful energy output. That is a goodly part of why crude oil makes such cheap energy. It comes to us in concentrated liquid form, easy to transport and easy to transform. Once you do the hard part (drilling) it practically jumps out of the wellhead.

So, biomass may be able to replace crude petroleum in the future, but the trick will be to get more energy out of it than you put in. That's the trick for all renewable energy resources. When we make the switch to renewable, the output half of the equation becomes less favorable than crude oil. We will just have to live with it.

-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), July 09, 2000.

I can just imagine the whole world covered with that greasy sludge you get from burning vegetable oil like Y2K Pro is covered with from cooking fries at Burger King. Yuuuck!

-- (slippery@roads.com), July 09, 2000.

The way I see it, its a simple supply and demand issue. When fossil fuels become short enough in supply, demand for alternatives such as plant oils, ethanol etc will grow regardless of the higher cost factors.

The Sixty Four thousand dollar question is when will this happen?

I'm Forty years old and I'll bet it happens in my lifetime.

-- Zdude (zdude777@hotmail.com), July 09, 2000.

Zdude:

I'm Forty years old and I'll bet it happens in my lifetime.

If you live in Jersey, I doubt it. It will take more than 5 years.

Brian:

So, biomass may be able to replace crude petroleum in the future, but the trick will be to get more energy out of it than you put in. That's the trick for all renewable energy resources. When we make the switch to renewable, the output half of the equation becomes less favorable than crude oil. We will just have to live with it.

To some extent your analysis is correct, but not completely true for all petrol products. Even so, we will need, in the future, to pay for any energy loss which provides fuel mobility. Biomass, can produce a fuel with mobility; other sources can't. We can either redesign our whole country [get rid of all of the decentralization] or we can pay the price for fuel mobility. The later is cheaper. What do you thi

-- DB (Debunker@nomore.xxx), July 09, 2000.

Why not use pig shit for power like we do in Bartertown?

-- (Master Blaster @ Beyond. Thunderdome), July 09, 2000.

Biofuels are at best a partial answer, for a reason already mentioned -- the amount of energy you get out versus the amount you put in. That doesn't mean just the fuel that runs the tractor, but the energy needed to make the tractor, the energy required for the distribution system, the energy required to manipulate plant oil to turn it into other products. The concept is called eMergy, for embodied energy. And remember that evbery gallon of biofuel burned means there's that much less food going out to keep people from going hungry.

Master Blaster, as for pig shit power AKA methane, it's fine for running fixed installations, such as generators, but it has much less energy per unit than gasoline. So you either need a lot more pig shit or use a lot less power. And it doesn't work well in mobile platforms, such as vehicles.

-- Cash (cash@andcarry.com), July 09, 2000.

>> We can either redesign our whole country [get rid of all of the decentralization] or we can pay the price for fuel mobility. <<

First, I have no particular expertise in the area of alternative energy. Compared to an expert, my pittance of knowledge is a mere scrap that cannot hide my ignorance. However, since you asked...

It seems to me that the distribution system for electricity provides an alternate model for the delivery of energy that replaces pipelines carrying liquid or gas fuels with wires. This model allows for centralization of access to the fuel, while still providing ease of distribution over existing pathways.

I do figure that any transition from oil to alternate energy is going to require a fair amount of redesign of the system. But I don't see that making diesel (or methane) from biomass is a necessary part of the design. It obviously has competition.

I still believe that doing the same work with less energy (conservation) is the most promising and cost-effective solution I know of. The few times I've heard a real expert speak on this, the numbers in favor of conservation were far out ahead of other energy "sources", using today's technology.

As soon as I need to replace my refrigerator and water heater, I plan to go with the most efficient ones I can find. Whenever I replace my vehicles, fuel efficiency is always a very big factor. Which reminds me. It is time to buy a bicycle!

-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), July 10, 2000.